In several of His Tablets, Bahá’u’lláh affirms the
distinction between allegorical verses, which are susceptible to
interpretation, and those verses that relate to such subjects as the laws and
ordinances, worship and religious observances, whose meanings are evident and
which demand compliance on the part of the believers.
…Bahá’u’lláh designated ‘Abdu’l‑Bahá, His eldest Son, as His Successor and the Interpreter of His
Teachings. ‘Abdu’l‑Bahá in His turn appointed His eldest grandson, Shoghi Effendi, to
succeed Him as interpreter of the holy Writ and Guardian of the Cause. The
interpretations of ‘Abdu’l‑Bahá and Shoghi Effendi are considered divinely guided and are
binding on the Bahá’ís.
The existence of authoritative interpretations does not
preclude the individual from engaging in the study of the Teachings and thereby
arriving at a personal interpretation or understanding. A clear distinction is,
however, drawn in the Bahá’í Writings between authoritative interpretation and
the understanding that each individual arrives at from a study of its
Teachings. Individual interpretations based on a person’s understanding of the
Teachings constitute the fruit of man’s rational power and may well contribute
to a greater comprehension of the Faith. Such views, nevertheless, lack
authority. In presenting their personal ideas, individuals are cautioned not to
discard the authority of the revealed words, not to deny or contend with the
authoritative interpretation, and not to engage in controversy; rather they
should offer their thoughts as a contribution to knowledge, making it clear
that their views are merely their own.
- The Universal House of Justice (The
Notes section of the Kitab-i-Aqdas)